Skip to content

Mountains · Snow · The natural world

Google Translate

Choose your language

MenuExplore Snow

If Earth’s Land Ice Melted: What the Sea-Level Maps Mean

Share this story
FacebookWhatsApp
More
TelegramXEmail

A map showing familiar coastlines disappearing beneath higher seas is a powerful way to visualise how much water is stored in ice. It is also easy to misunderstand. The “all ice melted” scenario is an extreme thought experiment, not a prediction that every glacier and ice sheet will vanish by the end of this century.

Tall glacier ice front meeting dark ocean water
Land ice and floating ice play different roles in sea-level change. Credit: Original Snow Addiction illustration; photographer not identified.

Science Insider’s 2015 video presents a version based on a roughly 216-foot rise, drawing on an earlier National Geographic visualisation. The U.S. Geological Survey’s FAQ gives an approximate figure of 70 metres, or 230 feet, for the complete melting of glaciers and ice caps, while noting uncertainty in the total ice volume.

Why “land ice” is the key phrase

Ice stored on land adds water to the ocean when it melts and that water reaches the sea. Floating sea ice is already displacing seawater, so its direct effect is different. The dramatic map is about the enormous store of land-based ice, not simply the disappearance of a winter layer on the ocean.

Actual sea level also responds to warming water expanding, along with regional processes. A single globally raised waterline is therefore an illustration of scale rather than a complete local flood model.

Keep the timescale attached to the claim

The IPCC’s AR6 Synthesis Report distinguishes projections for this century from changes that continue over centuries to millennia. Future sea-level rise depends on emissions and the response of the climate system. It is misleading to place the complete-melt map beside a 2100 statement as though they describe the same scenario.

That distinction does not make near-term change unimportant. Communities plan for much smaller rises because coastal flooding, storm impacts and local land movement can matter long before a continent’s outline looks different on a world map.

Three questions to ask of any sea-level graphic

  • What time period does it describe?
  • Is it a projection, a hypothetical scenario or a record of observed change?
  • Does it show a global average or conditions at a particular coast?

For a closer view of changing land ice, explore the Svalbard glacier comparison. For an iceberg event at a much shorter timescale, see the King’s Point rollover video. Keeping scale and time clear makes both stories more useful.

An extreme endpoint is not a dated forecast

The complete-melt illustration asks how coastlines would change under a very large addition of water from land ice. A projection for a particular century asks a different question: how much change is expected over a specified period under stated conditions. Placing both numbers in the same paragraph without explaining their timescales can make an extreme endpoint look like a forecast for the next few decades.

The USGS estimate of about seventy metres is an approximate global quantity, with uncertainty in the amount of stored ice. It should not be used as a precise local water-level instruction or a parcel-by-parcel flood map. A familiar city disappearing in an illustration communicates scale, but does not provide the detail needed to assess a particular neighbourhood.

For reading any similar map, look for the baseline, the amount of rise and whether a date or scenario is actually specified. Then separate what the graphic depicts from what its caption claims. This preserves the educational purpose of the visualisation while avoiding an invented timetable. The amount of ice stored on land is consequential enough without suggesting that every illustrated coastline change is imminent.

Reference: www.usgs.gov

Share this story
FacebookWhatsApp
More
TelegramXEmail

2 comments